[Performance] Optimize outputDebug to skip expensive work when disabled#7563
[Performance] Optimize outputDebug to skip expensive work when disabled#7563gonzaloriestra wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
github-actions
Bot
added
the
no-changelog
gonzaloriestra
force-pushed
the
jules-performance-optimize-output-debug-16389867832635500132
branch
3 times, most recently
from
f3d7426 to
3851655
Compare
gonzaloriestra
force-pushed
the
jules-performance-optimize-output-debug-16389867832635500132
branch
from
3851655 to
67254d5
Compare
2 participants
WHY are these changes introduced?
In high-frequency logging scenarios, `outputDebug` can become a bottleneck because it performs string construction, colorization, and timestamp generation (`new Date().toISOString()`) even when debug logging is disabled.
WHAT is this pull request doing?
This PR adds an early return to `outputDebug` using `shouldOutput('debug')`. This ensures that expensive string processing and timestamp generation only happen when debug logs are actually going to be displayed.
How to test your changes?
CI
Checklist
PR created automatically by Jules for task 16389867832635500132 started by @gonzaloriestra